Moderate Libertarians are those in the Libertarian quadrant who are outside the center circle but are at least 26 points from the top corner.
Guns | Should the Second Amendment stay in force? | ||||
ECONOMIC | |||||
Weighted Percent | Number | Unweighted Percent | Average Weight | Answer Text | Answer Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8% | 1382 | 1.9% | 77.9 | NO! Private gun ownership is too dangerous. (The 2nd Amendment is an obsolete relic from frontier days.) | 0 |
5.1% | 4048 | 5.5% | 73.4 | No. Ban private handguns. Carefully control hunting weapons. | 24 |
31.6% | 26553 | 35.8% | 69.3 | OK, but require registration and background checks. | 50 |
34.5% | 24785 | 33.4% | 81.1 | Yes. Legal handguns actually prevent crime, save lives, and give women equality. (And registration requirements are a dangerous slippery slope.) | 75 |
27.0% | 17399 | 23.5% | 90.5 | YES! Private MILITARY arms are the last bastion against tyranny. (And gun registration is a dangerous slippery slope) | 100 | 100% | 74167 | 100% | 78.6 | Total | 69.9 |
Subsidies & Tariffs | Should the government help certain "important" industries using subsidies, quotas, and/or tariffs? | ||||
ECONOMIC | |||||
Weighted Percent | Number | Unweighted Percent | Average Weight | Answer Text | Answer Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.0% | 802 | 1.1% | 71.0 | Yes! It is high time that the US implement an Industrial Policy, guiding industries to our national purpose. | 0 |
3.0% | 2319 | 3.1% | 69.7 | Yes. The Freedom to Farm Act and free trade with Mexico have hurt too many workers. Repeal them. | 27 |
12.5% | 10671 | 14.4% | 64.1 | Some. The current amount of support for distressed industries is about right. | 52 |
52.0% | 38992 | 52.6% | 72.7 | No. Subsidies keep inefficient industries in this country keeping us poorer in the long run. Limit subsidies to help out in short term crises only. | 77 |
31.5% | 21383 | 28.8% | 80.3 | NO! Giving taxpayer money to favored industries is theft, pure and simple! Eliminate all subsidies, quotas and protective tariffs. | 100 | 100% | 74167 | 100% | 73.5 | Total | 78.8 |
Education | Should the public schools be privatized? | ||||
ECONOMIC | |||||
Weighted Percent | Number | Unweighted Percent | Average Weight | Answer Text | Answer Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7.7% | 5545 | 7.5% | 88.6 | NO! We need to extend the public schools to day care and college. | 0 |
38.4% | 28493 | 38.4% | 85.6 | No. We need continued government ownership of schools. (Reform is possible.) | 45 |
29.7% | 22120 | 29.8% | 85.3 | Yes. Replace government-owned schools with government-provided vouchers for everyone. | 60 |
13.6% | 10203 | 13.8% | 84.8 | Yes! Government vouchers for the poor only. (Let the middle and upper classes write their own checks.) | 80 |
10.5% | 7806 | 10.5% | 85.4 | YES! Complete separation of education and state. (Let churches and other charities educate the poor.) | 100 | 100% | 74167 | 100% | 85.6 | Total | 56.5 |
Social Security | Should Social Security be phased out? | ||||
ECONOMIC | |||||
Weighted Percent | Number | Unweighted Percent | Average Weight | Answer Text | Answer Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.1% | 1532 | 2.1% | 75.5 | NO! All we have to do is start investing the Social Security trust fund in the stock market. | 0 |
1.4% | 1066 | 1.4% | 75.5 | NO! Raise taxes as necessary when the baby boomers retire. | 20 |
17.3% | 12973 | 17.5% | 74.0 | No, but pay down the national debt now, before the baby boomers retire. | 50 |
13.5% | 10680 | 14.4% | 70.0 | Some. Ramp up the retirement age so the average number of years for receiving government checks is brought back down to 5. | 60 |
13.6% | 10366 | 14.0% | 73.0 | Yes. Replace Social Security with a purely aged-based MINIMUM income (comparable to current minimum Social Security payouts) funded out of general revenues. | 68 |
17.3% | 12573 | 17.0% | 76.7 | Yes. Replace Social Security with a forced savings plan for the young. | 76 |
34.8% | 24977 | 33.7% | 77.4 | YES! Complete separation of retirement and state. Let people plan their own retirement. | 100 | 100% | 74167 | 100% | 74.9 | Total | 74.2 |
Workplace | Should the government continue to regulate employment relations in the name of Civil Rights? | ||||
ECONOMIC | |||||
Weighted Percent | Number | Unweighted Percent | Average Weight | Answer Text | Answer Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.9% | 1322 | 1.8% | 77.5 | YES! A job is a right. The burden of proof lies on the employer to fire anyone. All firings should be subject to judicial review. | 0 |
5.4% | 3871 | 5.2% | 74.5 | Yes! Workplace equality has not yet been achieved. Clearly more action is required. | 20 |
20.1% | 15665 | 21.1% | 68.3 | Yes. About what it is now. (Sure, some of the lawsuits are ridiculous, but it takes dire threats to bring certain employers into line.) | 44 |
40.0% | 30101 | 40.6% | 70.5 | No. The penalties for discrimination and/or offending people have gotten way out of line. The loss of a job is worth a few months' pay in damages at most. | 79 |
32.5% | 23208 | 31.3% | 74.4 | NO! Hiring and working should be purely voluntary activities. (The marketplace will punish discriminators.) | 100 | 100% | 74167 | 100% | 71.6 | Total | 74.1 |
Taxes & Spending | Should the size of government be significantly reduced (over a period of time)? | ||||
ECONOMIC | |||||
Weighted Percent | Number | Unweighted Percent | Average Weight | Answer Text | Answer Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.7% | 618 | 0.8% | 78.8 | NO! Government is too small. There are vital programs that are under-funded. | 0 |
4.0% | 3355 | 4.5% | 76.7 | No. Government is about the right size. | 40 |
27.0% | 21086 | 28.4% | 83.2 | Yes. Cut by 10-20% (eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse...). | 55 |
17.7% | 13008 | 17.5% | 88.3 | Yes! Cut significantly, 30-40%. | 65 |
15.1% | 10833 | 14.6% | 90.8 | Yes! Cut spending roughly in half. | 75 |
31.1% | 21852 | 29.5% | 92.6 | YES! Cut 70% or more. (The rightful function of government is to protect our borders and enforce laws protecting life, liberty and property.) | 86 |
4.4% | 3415 | 4.6% | 84.6 | YES!! Taxation is theft! Government should be run from voluntary contributions and user fees only. | 100 | 100% | 74167 | 100% | 87.7 | Total | 70.4 |
The Draft | Should military service be voluntary, or should there be a draft? | ||||
PERSONAL | |||||
Weighted Percent | Number | Unweighted Percent | Average Weight | Answer Text | Answer Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.9% | 4439 | 6.0% | 68.0 | Everyone should have the experience of two years of "National Service" (can be non-military). | 0 |
9.7% | 7957 | 10.7% | 62.6 | No draft now, but keep draft registration. | 50 |
29.6% | 23820 | 32.1% | 63.8 | Under extreme circumstances a draft could be acceptable. However, we do not need draft registration now. | 70 |
19.3% | 14413 | 19.4% | 68.9 | In times of crisis the problem is not lack of volunteers; the problem is lack of a prepared populace. Add military training to the basic high school curriculum and make training camps available without further obligation. | 80 |
35.5% | 23538 | 31.7% | 77.4 | The draft is slavery and therefore morally unacceptable. A country that needs a draft to defend itself deserves to lose. | 100 | 100% | 74167 | 100% | 69.2 | Total | 76.5 |
Censorship | Should the FCC regulate the content of broadcast television? | ||||
PERSONAL | |||||
Weighted Percent | Number | Unweighted Percent | Average Weight | Answer Text | Answer Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.2% | 177 | 0.2% | 72.7 | Yes! The government should own the air waves. We need a system like the BBC. | 0 |
1.8% | 1480 | 2.0% | 72.6 | Yes. We need less sex, less violence, and/or more "educational" TV. | 25 |
7.3% | 6137 | 8.3% | 69.4 | Yes. The current level of FCC power is about right. | 50 |
41.7% | 32100 | 43.3% | 76.3 | No. Let broadcasters choose content and format. Only require that they scramble the really rude stuff. | 76 |
49.0% | 34273 | 46.2% | 84.0 | No! Any government censorship is intolerable. Give broadcasters the same freedoms of expression enjoyed by publishers of books and magazines -- including how much sex, violence and crude language. | 100 | 100% | 74167 | 100% | 79.2 | Total | 84.8 |
Sex | Should the government have laws regulating sex between consenting adults? Should they be enforced? | ||||
PERSONAL | |||||
Weighted Percent | Number | Unweighted Percent | Average Weight | Answer Text | Answer Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.8% | 516 | 0.7% | 74.3 | Yes! It is time to actually enforce laws against sex out of wedlock and certain "deviant" acts. | 0 |
1.4% | 987 | 1.3% | 69.5 | Yes. Time to enforce the laws against certain "deviant" acts. | 25 |
1.3% | 976 | 1.3% | 65.8 | Yes. Time to enforce the laws against sex out of wedlock. | 30 |
5.2% | 4271 | 5.8% | 61.2 | Well, keep current sodomy and fornication laws on the books to make a statement, but don't enforce them. | 50 |
26.6% | 21533 | 29.0% | 62.5 | No. Sodomy and fornication laws are unenforceable and obsolete. Take them off the books. | 76 |
64.8% | 45884 | 61.9% | 71.4 | NO! The government has no right to regulate sex between consenting adults. Take all such laws off the books, including laws against prostitution. | 100 | 100% | 74167 | 100% | 68.2 | Total | 88.4 |
Drugs | Should the War on Drugs continue? | ||||
PERSONAL | |||||
Weighted Percent | Number | Unweighted Percent | Average Weight | Answer Text | Answer Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.7% | 1149 | 1.5% | 78.4 | YES! And we need to redouble our efforts! More life sentences! More mandatory drug tests! More no-knock warrants! | 0 |
4.0% | 2934 | 4.0% | 74.1 | Yes! Continue on our present course. | 44 |
12.8% | 10147 | 13.7% | 68.2 | Well yes, but obey the Constitution. Repeal civil asset forfeiture and/or lessen some of the more outrageous punishments. | 59 |
57.0% | 43180 | 58.2% | 71.2 | No. Legalize the safer drugs such as marijuana. Tax and regulate them like liquor. | 81 |
24.4% | 16757 | 22.6% | 78.7 | No! Legalize all recreational drugs for adult use. (What you take is none of the government's business as long as you handle your 'high' responsibly.) | 100 | 100% | 74167 | 100% | 72.7 | Total | 80.0 |
Immigration | Is illegal immigration a serious problem? Does it justify the cost and lost rights necessary to keep people out? | ||||
PERSONAL | |||||
Weighted Percent | Number | Unweighted Percent | Average Weight | Answer Text | Answer Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
8.7% | 5882 | 7.9% | 84.3 | Illegal immigration is a serious problem. Institute a national ID for everyone. | 0 |
45.8% | 31021 | 41.8% | 84.5 | Illegal immigration is a serious problem, but the solution is more border patrol and/or use of the military to guard the borders better. | 40 |
12.1% | 10676 | 14.4% | 64.8 | Keep the current system more or less. | 50 |
16.7% | 13632 | 18.4% | 70.0 | Keep the immigration quotas but keep our Constitutional rights also. Eliminate the proof of legal residency requirement to get a job. | 72 |
16.8% | 12956 | 17.5% | 74.2 | Immigrants are a blessing to this country. Open the gates! Just require that they pay their own way. | 100 | 100% | 74167 | 100% | 77.2 | Total | 53.1 |