All Except Radicals is everyone except those who scored near the corners.
Guns | Should the Second Amendment stay in force? | ||||
ECONOMIC | |||||
Weighted Percent | Number | Unweighted Percent | Average Weight | Answer Text | Answer Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7.1% | 17003 | 6.6% | 83.5 | NO! Private gun ownership is too dangerous. (The 2nd Amendment is an obsolete relic from frontier days.) | 0 |
13.7% | 34857 | 13.5% | 78.4 | No. Ban private handguns. Carefully control hunting weapons. | 24 |
40.7% | 114019 | 44.1% | 71.4 | OK, but require registration and background checks. | 50 |
24.2% | 60228 | 23.3% | 80.2 | Yes. Legal handguns actually prevent crime, save lives, and give women equality. (And registration requirements are a dangerous slippery slope.) | 75 |
14.4% | 32404 | 12.5% | 88.9 | YES! Private MILITARY arms are the last bastion against tyranny. (And gun registration is a dangerous slippery slope) | 100 | 100% | 258511 | 100% | 77.4 | Total | 56.1 |
Subsidies & Tariffs | Should the government help certain "important" industries using subsidies, quotas, and/or tariffs? | ||||
ECONOMIC | |||||
Weighted Percent | Number | Unweighted Percent | Average Weight | Answer Text | Answer Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
8.5% | 20893 | 8.1% | 74.3 | Yes! It is high time that the US implement an Industrial Policy, guiding industries to our national purpose. | 0 |
10.3% | 26777 | 10.4% | 69.9 | Yes. The Freedom to Farm Act and free trade with Mexico have hurt too many workers. Repeal them. | 27 |
26.8% | 74902 | 29.0% | 65.2 | Some. The current amount of support for distressed industries is about right. | 52 |
37.8% | 96984 | 37.5% | 71.0 | No. Subsidies keep inefficient industries in this country keeping us poorer in the long run. Limit subsidies to help out in short term crises only. | 77 |
16.6% | 38955 | 15.1% | 77.8 | NO! Giving taxpayer money to favored industries is theft, pure and simple! Eliminate all subsidies, quotas and protective tariffs. | 100 | 100% | 258511 | 100% | 70.5 | Total | 62.4 |
Education | Should the public schools be privatized? | ||||
ECONOMIC | |||||
Weighted Percent | Number | Unweighted Percent | Average Weight | Answer Text | Answer Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
23.4% | 57895 | 22.4% | 92.8 | NO! We need to extend the public schools to day care and college. | 0 |
46.3% | 119959 | 46.4% | 88.6 | No. We need continued government ownership of schools. (Reform is possible.) | 45 |
18.2% | 48514 | 18.8% | 86.2 | Yes. Replace government-owned schools with government-provided vouchers for everyone. | 60 |
6.8% | 18195 | 7.0% | 85.7 | Yes! Government vouchers for the poor only. (Let the middle and upper classes write their own checks.) | 80 |
5.2% | 13948 | 5.4% | 85.8 | YES! Complete separation of education and state. (Let churches and other charities educate the poor.) | 100 | 100% | 258511 | 100% | 88.7 | Total | 42.4 |
Social Security | Should Social Security be phased out? | ||||
ECONOMIC | |||||
Weighted Percent | Number | Unweighted Percent | Average Weight | Answer Text | Answer Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
9.6% | 23232 | 9.0% | 81.2 | NO! All we have to do is start investing the Social Security trust fund in the stock market. | 0 |
8.7% | 21712 | 8.4% | 78.8 | NO! Raise taxes as necessary when the baby boomers retire. | 20 |
28.8% | 74684 | 28.9% | 75.8 | No, but pay down the national debt now, before the baby boomers retire. | 50 |
14.8% | 40821 | 15.8% | 71.4 | Some. Ramp up the retirement age so the average number of years for receiving government checks is brought back down to 5. | 60 |
9.8% | 25951 | 10.0% | 74.0 | Yes. Replace Social Security with a purely aged-based MINIMUM income (comparable to current minimum Social Security payouts) funded out of general revenues. | 68 |
11.8% | 30048 | 11.6% | 77.4 | Yes. Replace Social Security with a forced savings plan for the young. | 76 |
16.5% | 42063 | 16.3% | 77.2 | YES! Complete separation of retirement and state. Let people plan their own retirement. | 100 | 100% | 258511 | 100% | 76.1 | Total | 57.2 |
Workplace | Should the government continue to regulate employment relations in the name of Civil Rights? | ||||
ECONOMIC | |||||
Weighted Percent | Number | Unweighted Percent | Average Weight | Answer Text | Answer Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
8.6% | 20025 | 7.7% | 81.9 | YES! A job is a right. The burden of proof lies on the employer to fire anyone. All firings should be subject to judicial review. | 0 |
19.7% | 47943 | 18.5% | 78.3 | Yes! Workplace equality has not yet been achieved. Clearly more action is required. | 20 |
28.9% | 77946 | 30.2% | 70.7 | Yes. About what it is now. (Sure, some of the lawsuits are ridiculous, but it takes dire threats to bring certain employers into line.) | 44 |
26.6% | 71400 | 27.6% | 71.0 | No. The penalties for discrimination and/or offending people have gotten way out of line. The loss of a job is worth a few months' pay in damages at most. | 79 |
16.2% | 41197 | 15.9% | 74.8 | NO! Hiring and working should be purely voluntary activities. (The marketplace will punish discriminators.) | 100 | 100% | 258511 | 100% | 73.7 | Total | 53.9 |
Taxes & Spending | Should the size of government be significantly reduced (over a period of time)? | ||||
ECONOMIC | |||||
Weighted Percent | Number | Unweighted Percent | Average Weight | Answer Text | Answer Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
10.1% | 27181 | 10.5% | 81.7 | NO! Government is too small. There are vital programs that are under-funded. | 0 |
15.6% | 43088 | 16.7% | 79.5 | No. Government is about the right size. | 40 |
35.8% | 94040 | 36.4% | 83.3 | Yes. Cut by 10-20% (eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse...). | 55 |
12.5% | 31307 | 12.1% | 87.7 | Yes! Cut significantly, 30-40%. | 65 |
8.8% | 21432 | 8.3% | 89.8 | Yes! Cut spending roughly in half. | 75 |
14.4% | 34356 | 13.3% | 91.5 | YES! Cut 70% or more. (The rightful function of government is to protect our borders and enforce laws protecting life, liberty and property.) | 86 |
2.7% | 7107 | 2.7% | 83.5 | YES!! Taxation is theft! Government should be run from voluntary contributions and user fees only. | 100 | 100% | 258511 | 100% | 84.7 | Total | 55.8 |
The Draft | Should military service be voluntary, or should there be a draft? | ||||
PERSONAL | |||||
Weighted Percent | Number | Unweighted Percent | Average Weight | Answer Text | Answer Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
12.7% | 31628 | 12.2% | 72.0 | Everyone should have the experience of two years of "National Service" (can be non-military). | 0 |
15.2% | 41641 | 16.1% | 65.4 | No draft now, but keep draft registration. | 50 |
33.3% | 91153 | 35.3% | 65.4 | Under extreme circumstances a draft could be acceptable. However, we do not need draft registration now. | 70 |
13.6% | 35052 | 13.6% | 69.6 | In times of crisis the problem is not lack of volunteers; the problem is lack of a prepared populace. Add military training to the basic high school curriculum and make training camps available without further obligation. | 80 |
25.2% | 59037 | 22.8% | 76.6 | The draft is slavery and therefore morally unacceptable. A country that needs a draft to defend itself deserves to lose. | 100 | 100% | 258511 | 100% | 69.3 | Total | 67.0 |
Censorship | Should the FCC regulate the content of broadcast television? | ||||
PERSONAL | |||||
Weighted Percent | Number | Unweighted Percent | Average Weight | Answer Text | Answer Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.8% | 9155 | 3.5% | 78.3 | Yes! The government should own the air waves. We need a system like the BBC. | 0 |
12.4% | 31933 | 12.4% | 74.2 | Yes. We need less sex, less violence, and/or more "educational" TV. | 25 |
19.0% | 54033 | 20.9% | 67.2 | Yes. The current level of FCC power is about right. | 50 |
34.9% | 92407 | 35.7% | 72.1 | No. Let broadcasters choose content and format. Only require that they scramble the really rude stuff. | 76 |
29.9% | 70983 | 27.5% | 80.4 | No! Any government censorship is intolerable. Give broadcasters the same freedoms of expression enjoyed by publishers of books and magazines -- including how much sex, violence and crude language. | 100 | 100% | 258511 | 100% | 73.8 | Total | 69.0 |
Sex | Should the government have laws regulating sex between consenting adults? Should they be enforced? | ||||
PERSONAL | |||||
Weighted Percent | Number | Unweighted Percent | Average Weight | Answer Text | Answer Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6.1% | 13007 | 5.0% | 80.3 | Yes! It is time to actually enforce laws against sex out of wedlock and certain "deviant" acts. | 0 |
5.8% | 13860 | 5.4% | 71.7 | Yes. Time to enforce the laws against certain "deviant" acts. | 25 |
5.1% | 12611 | 4.9% | 68.9 | Yes. Time to enforce the laws against sex out of wedlock. | 30 |
11.7% | 32687 | 12.6% | 61.3 | Well, keep current sodomy and fornication laws on the books to make a statement, but don't enforce them. | 50 |
28.1% | 79278 | 30.7% | 60.6 | No. Sodomy and fornication laws are unenforceable and obsolete. Take them off the books. | 76 |
43.1% | 107068 | 41.4% | 68.8 | NO! The government has no right to regulate sex between consenting adults. Take all such laws off the books, including laws against prostitution. | 100 | 100% | 258511 | 100% | 66.1 | Total | 73.3 |
Drugs | Should the War on Drugs continue? | ||||
PERSONAL | |||||
Weighted Percent | Number | Unweighted Percent | Average Weight | Answer Text | Answer Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
15.1% | 33589 | 13.0% | 87.0 | YES! And we need to redouble our efforts! More life sentences! More mandatory drug tests! More no-knock warrants! | 0 |
13.6% | 33503 | 13.0% | 78.2 | Yes! Continue on our present course. | 44 |
16.4% | 44585 | 17.2% | 71.1 | Well yes, but obey the Constitution. Repeal civil asset forfeiture and/or lessen some of the more outrageous punishments. | 59 |
42.6% | 116150 | 44.9% | 70.7 | No. Legalize the safer drugs such as marijuana. Tax and regulate them like liquor. | 81 |
12.3% | 30684 | 11.9% | 77.6 | No! Legalize all recreational drugs for adult use. (What you take is none of the government's business as long as you handle your 'high' responsibly.) | 100 | 100% | 258511 | 100% | 74.7 | Total | 62.4 |
Immigration | Is illegal immigration a serious problem? Does it justify the cost and lost rights necessary to keep people out? | ||||
PERSONAL | |||||
Weighted Percent | Number | Unweighted Percent | Average Weight | Answer Text | Answer Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
20.6% | 48199 | 18.6% | 86.6 | Illegal immigration is a serious problem. Institute a national ID for everyone. | 0 |
39.4% | 96243 | 37.2% | 82.9 | Illegal immigration is a serious problem, but the solution is more border patrol and/or use of the military to guard the borders better. | 40 |
14.1% | 42737 | 16.5% | 66.9 | Keep the current system more or less. | 50 |
13.8% | 39208 | 15.2% | 71.4 | Keep the immigration quotas but keep our Constitutional rights also. Eliminate the proof of legal residency requirement to get a job. | 72 |
12.0% | 32124 | 12.4% | 75.3 | Immigrants are a blessing to this country. Open the gates! Just require that they pay their own way. | 100 | 100% | 258511 | 100% | 78.2 | Total | 44.8 |